Source
The record behind the activity.
Methodology
A clearer path from activity data to reviewable emissions information.
Airgold keeps boundaries, units, factors, calculations and evidence connected so each result can be understood.
Method workflow
ExampleFuel log
Business record
Electricity bill
Business record
Transport sheet
Business record
Carbon report
Buyer review pack
Scope coverage
Factor source
Evidence notes
Review gaps
Activity data
Define what the report covers first.
Records need company context, reporting period, activity and unit before they can support a result.
How are reporting boundaries set?
The organization, operation, reporting period and relevant activities are defined before calculation. Exclusions and unresolved questions remain visible.
How are units handled?
Airgold keeps the supplier's original value and unit alongside any explicit normalized unit used by the calculation.
How are factors governed?
Factors retain their source, version, geography, activity and compatible unit. Unsupported contexts should pause for review.
What does GHG Protocol-aligned mean here?
Airgold uses GHG Protocol concepts for boundaries, scopes and calculation structure. This does not mean external verification, certification or universal compliance.
Factors and calculations
Govern the inputs. Repeat the result.
The same reviewed activity data and factor should produce the same result.
Deterministic calculation
Activity data
Normalized quantity
Governed factor
Source and version
Result
Lineage attached
Evidence and review
Keep the path behind the result.
Every result should preserve enough context to understand what changed and what still needs attention.
Method
Units, factor and calculation logic.
Judgement
Assumptions, estimates and exclusions.
Status
Complete, missing or awaiting review.
References